Added by Stats. 1975, Ch. 1275.
of the realty should be compared with its value if it were removed and sold.
California Code of Civil Procedure — §§ 1263.205-1263.270
Added by Stats. 1975, Ch. 1275.
of the realty should be compared with its value if it were removed and sold.
Added by Stats. 1975, Ch. 1275.
Added by Stats. 1975, Ch. 1275.
defendant so moves prior to such date and gives the plaintiff written notice thereof, the date 24 hours after such notice is received by the plaintiff.
Added by Stats. 1975, Ch. 1275.
Improvements pertaining to the realty made subsequent to the date of service of summons shall not be taken into account in determining compensation unless one of the following is established:
court that the hardship to the defendant of not permitting the improvement outweighs the hardship to the plaintiff of permitting the improvement. The court may, at the time it makes an order under this subdivision authorizing the improvement to be made, limit the extent to which the improvement shall be taken into account in determining compensation.
Added by Stats. 1975, Ch. 1275.
planting crops after service of summons, in which case the compensation awarded for the property taken shall include an amount sufficient to compensate for loss caused by the limitation on the defendant’s right to use the property.
Added by Stats. 1975, Ch. 1275.
Notwithstanding Section 1263.210, the owner of improvements pertaining to the realty may elect to remove any or all such improvements by serving on the plaintiff within 60 days after service of summons written notice of such election. If the plaintiff fails within 30 days thereafter to serve on the owner written notice of refusal to allow removal of such improvements, the owner may remove such improvements and shall be compensated for their reasonable removal and relocation cost not to exceed the market value of the improvements. Where such removal will cause damage to the structure in which the improvements are located, the defendant shall cause no more damage to the
structure than is reasonably necessary in removing the improvements, and the structure shall be valued as if the removal had caused no damage to the structure.
Added by Stats. 1975, Ch. 1275.
Where an improvement pertaining to the realty is located in part upon property taken and in part upon property not taken, the court may, on motion of any party and a determination that justice so requires, direct the plaintiff to acquire the entire improvement, including the part located on property not taken, together with an easement or other interest reasonably necessary for the demolition, removal, or relocation of the improvement.