transportation network company drivers and the transportation network companies, including where those agreements are multiparty, sectoral agreements, outweighs the anticompetitive effect of those agreements. It is the state’s intent that the state action antitrust exemption to the application of federal and state antitrust laws shall apply to the activities of transportation network company drivers, transportation network company driver organizations, bargaining representatives for transportation network company drivers, and transportation network companies when they are participating in negotiations and other activities as authorized or regulated by this chapter.
transportation network
company drivers the opportunity to self-organize and designate representatives of their own choosing in order to bargain with transportation network companies, to facilitate the prevention or prompt resolution of disputes between transportation network companies and transportation network company drivers, and to improve the working conditions of transportation network company drivers and therefore the services provided to the general public.
policy of the state to establish various notice requirements, conditions, and timelines governing the representation of transportation network company drivers. It is the policy of the state to require transportation network companies and certified driver bargaining organizations to negotiate in good faith pursuant to the act and to set forth procedures for mediation and arbitration for purposes of reaching a bargaining agreement.
7448). That measure establishes certain minimum standards for app-based drivers, while allowing, as the California courts have held, the state to create a system for negotiations between transportation network company drivers and transportation network companies, including, by agreement, to voluntarily increase the standards that were established by Proposition 22. This chapter establishes a robust system to authorize those negotiations, while accommodating Proposition 22, which limits the state’s ability to impose certain terms through the binding interest arbitration process that applies if the parties are otherwise unable to reach an agreement but does not otherwise impose limits on that process.
Cite this section