Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 1155.
The county shall prepare the local protection program for the marsh. The local protection program shall be consistent with the provisions of this division and the policies of the protection plan.
Article 1 - Local Protection Program
California Public Resources Code — §§ 29400-29409.5
Sections (11)
Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 1155.
Within the marsh the local protection program shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
(a)Any amendments to general or specific plans applicable to any area within the marsh necessary to bring such plans into conformity with this division and the policies of the protection plan.
(b)Enforceable standards for diking, flooding, draining, filling, and dredging of sloughs, managed wetlands, and marshes.
(c)Enforceable standards for operation of septic tanks and wastewater discharges.
(d)A management program prepared by the Suisun Resource Conservation District designed to preserve, protect, and enhance the plant and wildlife communities within the primary management area of the marsh, including, but not limited to, enforceable standards for diking, flooding, draining, filling, and dredging of sloughs, managed wetlands, and marshes.
(e)Zoning ordinances or zoning district maps, or both, designating principal permitted uses on lands within the marsh, which ordinances or maps shall designate the existing agricultural and wildlife habitat uses of such lands as principal permitted uses of such lands.
(f)Enforceable standards for development to ensure that any use of deepwater industrial and port areas near Collinsville designated on the Suisun Marsh Protection Plan Map is in conformity with the policies of the protection plan.
(g)Enforceable standards for the design and location of any new development in the marsh to protect the visual characteristics of the marsh and, where possible, to enhance views of the marsh.
(h)Enforceable standards for development designed (1) to minimize soil erosion, especially during construction in areas of soil instability, (2) to require special provisions for surface and subsurface drainage, (3) to ensure that grading restores, rather than disrupts, natural patterns and volumes of surface runoff, and (4) to limit construction of impermeable surfaces over naturally permeable soils and geologic areas, all to control erosion, sedimentation, and runoff within the marsh.
(i)Enforceable standards for development adjacent to creeks and watercourses to protect riparian habitat and to prevent waterway modification or vegetation removal that increases sedimentation or runoff in or into the marsh, to an extent that a significant, adverse environmental impact will occur in the marsh.
Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 1155.
Outside the marsh, but within the watershed, the local protection program shall include only ordinances controlling grading, erosion, sedimentation, runoff, and creekside development that meet the requirements of subdivisions (h) and (i) of Section 29401.
Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 1155.
Within the marsh, in addition to the requirements of Sections 29400 and 29401, the component of the local protection program prepared by the county shall include the following:
(a)A determination of the minimum size parcels necessary for long-term agricultural use and productivity.
(b)Enforceable standards limiting or prohibiting land divisions or other development that are inconsistent with protection of the marsh and continued agricultural use.
(c)Enforceable standards precluding agricultural uses by type and intensity that are inconsistent with the long-term preservation of the marsh.
(d)Limitations on special assessments against agricultural lands for the provision of public services, the demand for which is not generated by agricultural uses on such lands.
Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 1155.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 29403, the local protection program may not include any provision requiring particular crops to be planted and harvested on agricultural lands within or adjacent to the marsh or particular types or numbers of livestock to be grazed on such lands.
Amended by Stats. 1982, Ch. 413, Sec. 4.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 29400, 29401, 29402, and 29403, the local protection program for that portion of the secondary management area west of State Highway Route 680 and outside the city limits of the City of Fairfield as of January 1, 1977, may include only ordinances to be prepared by the county, in cooperation with the City of Benicia, which control grading, erosion, sediment, runoff, and creekside development and which meet the requirements of subdivisions (h) and (i) of Section 29401. Such ordinances shall take into consideration the seismic hazards and unusually erodible and landslide-prone soils at this location, and ensure that development, if any, in this portion of the secondary management area will not cause increased sedimentation within the marsh.
Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 1155.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 29400, 29402, and 29403, the local protection program for the area that is located east of State Highway Route 680, southeast of State Highway Route 80, south of State Highway Route 12, and outside the marsh, and that is also located within the City of Fairfield, or within the sphere of influence of the City of Fairfield as such sphere of influence existed on January 1, 1977, may contain only (1) zoning ordinances implementing the land use designations of the Cordelia Area General Plan Diagram as adopted by the City of Fairfield on September 17, 1974, and which is a part of the Central Solano County General Plan and (2) ordinances controlling grading, erosion, sedimentation, runoff, and creekside development that meet the requirements of subdivisions (h) and (i) of Section 29401.
Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 1155.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 29400, 29401, and 29403, the local protection program for that portion of the secondary management area west of Shiloh Road and south of State Highway Route 12 may not prohibit construction of reasonable improvements (including construction of individual single-family dwellings) related to the long-term continuation of existing agricultural uses; nor shall the local protection program limit or prohibit divisions of agricultural land within or adjacent to this portion of the secondary management area if such divisions of land do not affect long-term continuation of compatible agricultural uses within, or adjacent to, the marsh.
Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 1155.
The local protection program shall not preclude the continuation and expansion of existing nonagricultural uses on sites in Section 11 or 12 of Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Mount Diablo Baseline and Meridian, that were zoned for such uses as of January 1, 1977, and for the conduct of such uses so that they do not cause any substantial, adverse impact on the marsh. The local protection program shall also provide that any other use of these sites in the future shall be compatible with the preservation of the marsh and its wildlife resources.
Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 1155.
Notwithstanding the policies of the protection plan, the local protection program may not preclude the future development of a new solid waste disposal site in the Potrero Hills if it can be demonstrated that the construction and operation of solid waste facilities at that site would not have significant, adverse ecological or aesthetic impacts on the marsh.
Added by Stats. 1977, Ch. 1155.
The component of the local protection program prepared by the Solano County Local Agency Formation Commission shall conform to this division and the policies of the protection plan, which shall govern its decisions. That component of the local protection program shall be specifically designed to encourage continued long-term agricultural use of lands within and adjacent to the marsh and continued wildlife use of lands within the marsh.