Amended by Stats. 2019, Ch. 864, Sec. 2. (AB 922) Effective January 1, 2020.
The following definitions apply to this chapter:
of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, or undue influence on the research participant’s decision.
California Health and Safety Code — §§ 125330-125356
Amended by Stats. 2019, Ch. 864, Sec. 2. (AB 922) Effective January 1, 2020.
The following definitions apply to this chapter:
of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, or undue influence on the research participant’s decision.
Added by Stats. 2019, Ch. 864, Sec. 3. (AB 922) Effective January 1, 2020.
medical research, and any drug or device to be utilized.
Amended by Stats. 2007, Ch. 483, Sec. 34. Effective January 1, 2008.
Amended by Stats. 2019, Ch. 864, Sec. 4. (AB 922) Effective January 1, 2020.
consent from the research participant constitutes unprofessional conduct within the meaning of Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000) of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code. This section does not relieve the physician and surgeon from other existing duties under the law, including, but not limited to, the duty to obtain a research participant’s informed consent after fully explaining the proposed procedure. The requirement that a physician and surgeon provide the standardized written summary pursuant to Section 125335 is in addition to, and does not supplant, other existing legal requirements regarding informed consent, including, but not limited to, compliance with the Protection of Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation Act (Chapter 1.3 (commencing with Section 24170) of Division 20).
donated pursuant to protocols or standards that are generally recognized and accepted by national or international scientific bodies.
Amended by Stats. 2019, Ch. 864, Sec. 5. (AB 922) Effective January 1, 2020.
An institutional review board (IRB) that reviews and approves medical and scientific research shall require all of the following of any research program or project that comes under its review that involves AOP or any alternative method of oocyte retrieval:
retrieval.
alternative method of oocyte retrieval is provided to the research participant prior to the procedure.
Amended by Stats. 2021, Ch. 615, Sec. 287. (AB 474) Effective January 1, 2022. Operative January 1, 2023, pursuant to Sec. 463 of Stats. 2021, Ch. 615.
those materials.
department shall provide public access to information that it is required to release pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 7920.000) of Title 1 of the Government Code). The department shall disseminate the information to the general public via governmental and other websites in a manner that is understandable to the average person. The information shall be made available to the public when the biennial review pursuant to Section 125119.5 is provided to the Legislature.
Added by Stats. 2006, Ch. 483, Sec. 7. Effective January 1, 2007.
Any employee who works in the unit conducting stem cell research using human oocytes, persons who report to, or are supervised by, the principal investigator or key personnel of the project, or both, along with the principal investigator and the key personnel of the project, and the immediate family members of any of the above persons are prohibited from being a subject in the research.
Added by Stats. 2006, Ch. 483, Sec. 7. Effective January 1, 2007.
The physician and surgeon performing the AOP or any alternative method of oocyte retrieval shall not have a financial interest in the outcome of the research.
Added by Stats. 2006, Ch. 483, Sec. 7. Effective January 1, 2007.
Pursuant to guidelines adopted by the Research Council and Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, researchers shall offer subjects an opportunity to document their preferences regarding future uses of their donated materials. The consent process shall fully explore whether subjects have objections to any specific forms of research to ensure that their wishes are honored.
Added by Stats. 2006, Ch. 483, Sec. 7. Effective January 1, 2007.
Any procedures for procuring oocytes in this state for research or the development of medical therapies shall meet all of the standards for subjects included in this chapter. All oocytes procured outside of this state for research taking place in this state shall meet these same standards. All egg extractions for research shall be approved by an institutional review board pursuant to Section 125341.
Added by Stats. 2006, Ch. 483, Sec. 7. Effective January 1, 2007.
No human oocyte or embryo shall be acquired, sold, offered for sale, received, or otherwise transferred for valuable consideration for the purposes of medical research or development of medical therapies. For purposes of this section, “valuable consideration” does not include reasonable payment for the removal, processing, disposal, preservation, quality control, and storage of oocytes or embryos.
Repealed (in Sec. 7) and added by Stats. 2019, Ch. 864, Sec. 8. (AB 922) Effective January 1, 2020. Section operative January 1, 2024, by its own provisions.
Added by Stats. 2019, Ch. 864, Sec. 9. (AB 922) Effective January 1, 2020.
If an individual providing human oocytes for the purposes of fertility is compensated, and any human oocytes or embryos in excess of those needed for fertility are offered for research, the institutional review board shall disregard the amount of compensation if all of the following conditions are met:
research purposes of human oocytes that were initially provided for reproductive uses, either for use by the donor or another individual, shall not knowingly compromise the optimal reproductive success of the individual in the infertility treatment.