Added by Stats. 2011, 1st Ex. Sess., Ch. 6, Sec. 2. (AB 27 1x) Effective June 29, 2011. Ruled unconstitutional per California Redevelopment Assn. v. Matosantos (2011) 53 Cal.4th 231.
The community remittances that are made under this part are intended to benefit the community by ensuring improved educational and other community services in the areas served by the redevelopment agency.
(a)A city or county’s agreement to remit revenues to school entities and special districts under this part is a precondition to continue redevelopment pursuant to this part.
(b)Participation in the alternative voluntary redevelopment program shall also constitute an agreement, on the part of a city or county, that it assigns its rights to any payments owed from a redevelopment agency, including, but not limited to, payments from loan agreements, to the
state, in the event that the city or county fails to make a remittance required pursuant to this part.
Cite this section